Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mike Mills's avatar

Although it's not surprising that Silman is up there in terms of improvement, I wonder if the improvement is similar to the early gains that people have when weight-lifting. Often early on it's easy to make gains because there is so much that needs improvement that a solid guide makes a lot of difference.

I think Silman's books guide people from poor understanding of the game to competence. And that's a world of difference. And once you're at that level it becomes much harder to generalize advice to help people improve. Which is why some books for one person will be a revelation and for others will just be ho-hum.

The Amateur's Mind was the first book I read. I had just finished a period in my life with a lot of online games and I wanted a guide on being one of the best in my area. I learned a lot but came away disappointed because it wasn't a complete step by step guide to becoming a master. (Though the "Steps" series might be similar to what I was looking for it wasn't on my radar)

I don't think a single book can make a person a complete chess player but the right books at the right times can make a world of difference.

Expand full comment
Alec's avatar

A book left out is Reuben Fine's Chess the Easy Way. A lot of players in the past who studied it got results with it and Chess Coaches always ask publishers to reprint. A Chess book doesn't have to be the size of a medical or law book. It will show the way, but the rest is up to the student to put the effort into doing.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts